Difference between revisions of "SWR/Power meter"

From Note to self
Jump to: navigation, search
(Links)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
* [http://home.arcor.de/yo4gms/Directional%20Coupler%20pa0nhc.htm Directional Couplers / SWR detectors for 145MHz - 435MHz]
 
* [http://home.arcor.de/yo4gms/Directional%20Coupler%20pa0nhc.htm Directional Couplers / SWR detectors for 145MHz - 435MHz]
 
* [http://www.multek.se/engelska/engineering/pcb-structures-2/embedded-microstrip-impedance-calculator-2 Multi-Teknik Impedance calculator]
 
* [http://www.multek.se/engelska/engineering/pcb-structures-2/embedded-microstrip-impedance-calculator-2 Multi-Teknik Impedance calculator]
 +
* [http://www.qsl.net/va3iul/Microstrip%20impedance/How_to_measure_the_impedance_of_a_micro-strip_Transmission_Line.htm How to measure transmission line impedance]
 +
* [http://www.antenna-theory.com/tutorial/txline/transmissionline.php Introduction to transmission lines]
 +
* [http://www.antenna-theory.com/tutorial/smith/chart.php Smith chart tutorial]
 +
 
= Step 1 =
 
= Step 1 =
 
The plan is to make a test setup, somewhat like what W2AEW did, but with an embedded microstrip design like in the QEX article. The idea is then to measure properties with my N2PK VNA. Or at least, try to.
 
The plan is to make a test setup, somewhat like what W2AEW did, but with an embedded microstrip design like in the QEX article. The idea is then to measure properties with my N2PK VNA. Or at least, try to.

Revision as of 04:02, 19 November 2015

Links

Step 1

The plan is to make a test setup, somewhat like what W2AEW did, but with an embedded microstrip design like in the QEX article. The idea is then to measure properties with my N2PK VNA. Or at least, try to.

Impedance

So, the big problem, how wide should the traces be. According to the calculator from Multi-Teknik, referencenced in the QEX calculator, I get a width that varies a bit around 2.1mm (trace thickness = 0.035mm, h=1.6mm, total height = 3.2mm, Er=4.2...4.8).